|
|
The cost of not being present in SEO . However, migration failures are not the only cases in which brands realize the value of SEO through loss: not working on your SEO in a competitive environment (which takes care of your SEO!) can be enough to more or less dry up. completely the source. 2. By the economy Brands present in SEA can take advantage of the many synergies that exist between SEO and SEA . Let's take the example of keyword A: let's imagine that it appears in 3rd SEA position on the search engines and that it costs €0.50 per click.
If keyword A generates 5,000 monthly visits, its purchase in SEA therefore costs €2,500 per month. A sum that could be largely saved if keyword A had been worked on in SEO. In this example, the Hong Kong Phone Number question is less about “how much does it cost not to invest in SEO” and more about “how much does it not cost to do so”. SEA investments should not be a recourse to compensate for deficient or non-existent SEO .
Most of the time, developing your SEO allows you to either rationalize certain SEA investments or invest them more strategically (in particular by reallocating budgets to top keywords or by working on dual SEO-SEA display). Read also: 6 tips to better rank your website on Google 3. By the loss of income Some companies have long neglected to invest in SEO, many relying above all on the notoriety of their brand (this is particularly the case for luxury companies like Chanel or Louis Vuitton).
|
|
發表於 14:25:21